User:Rmhermen
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Book_of_Knowledge3.jpg)
![]() | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
Action | Count |
---|---|
Edits | 61504 |
Edits+Deleted | 64867 |
Pages deleted | 3958 |
Revisions deleted | 14 |
Pages restored | 30 |
Pages protected | 80 |
Pages unprotected | 9 |
Protections modified | 23 |
Users blocked | 101 |
Users reblocked | 1 |
User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- Jake loves grass (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning Devchar (talk) 20:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Username55737288 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Huggie99 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Denond trump (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Dogoventures (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Örnólfur Fróði (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Urmomcherry (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Emmaikikeiram (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "kike" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Георги м (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Timmytrumpets (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 12:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Rampant Ninja Related Crimes (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "crime" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Avanguardia Torino Nazionalisti-Identitari-Rivoluzionari (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: High level of vandalism and tarnishing of information by some users in the name of editing. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 07:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This appears to be the case of an article being unilaterally replaced with a redirect. Please discuss it with WeyerStudentOfAgrippa and, if you're unable to resolve the question, review WP:DISPUTE and, if necessary, take the matter to WP:AIV. Chetsford (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC) Chetsford (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – The subject is a Saudi Arabian dissident, and critic. IP users continue to introduce violations of the WP:BLP, especially as it pertains to sourcing, gossip, and BLP balance. IP users keep adding mentions of the subject engaging in sex work, and yellow journalism level gossip regarding subjects relationships and personal life, which is completely inappropriate for a BLP Wikipedia article of a person largely notable for a single event. In my personal opinion, these are attempts to further victimise the subject by smearing them in highly search ranked Wikipedia pages. Please consider protecting the page. Pinging admins who previously protected this page: Ohnoitsjamie, Deepfriedokra. Melmann 10:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 90 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The nature of the violative edits is such that they should not be visible to logged-in users. The cadence they're occurring at is too brisk for the PC reviewers to handle. Chetsford (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am a PC reviewer and I am keeping an eye on the page, hence why I requested the PC. But I cannot obviously make any promises regarding keeping the page in check on my own, so this works too. Thank you for intervening. Melmann 18:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jolielover♥talk 11:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive changes of file by various (potentially linked) accounts to use a copyvio image and removing presently used file. Trailblazer101 (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 12:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a highly contentious ongoing conflict. Unregistered users have gotten their attention on it, which is becoming a problem. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Subject has been reported dead by several self published sources, however, no RS is reporting it yet. Have had many well-meaning but BLP-inexperienced editors trying to update the article with death info from these sources; request increase to EC protection. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Vellutis (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Subject is editing about himself DACartman (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined Except in exceptional circumstances, we shouldn't protect articles to arrest WP:COI editing. Please first try to engage the editor as per WP:BLPKIND. If that fails, further mitigatory measures can be attempted. Chetsford (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Multiple attempts to remove Denali redirect DACartman (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - Ratnahastin (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Easier to do this. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page should be protected under the Wikipedia:GS/CASTE and recently it getting some biased information without any proper source under the WP:RAJ. Mr.fakepolicy (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of ip's adding variations of greatest of all time (unreferenced). Knitsey (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I am requesting page protection for Ponnar Shankar due to continuous vandalism by a specific user, Minakshi Pillai. This user has repeatedly engaged in disruptive edits, particularly targeting articles related to Vellalars and related topics. The repeated vandalism is affecting the integrity of the page and its content.
Additionally, I would like to clarify that some of the historical and folkloric information in the article comes from oral traditions, which may limit the availability of high-quality sources. However, these details are still valuable for documenting cultural history.
I kindly request that appropriate action be taken, such as page protection or user intervention, to prevent further vandalism. Mr.fakepolicy (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple IPs, trying to change the content to Ghana, whereas Detty December (Ghana) already exists as a separate article - had to have a 1 week protection in January - Arjayay (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I am requesting page protection for Maruthanayagam Pillai due to repeated disruptive edits by a particular user Minakshi Pillai. This user has been consistently altering sourced information and replacing it with their own biased opinions, which affects the accuracy and neutrality of the article. Mr.fakepolicy (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Devchar (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
No protection: No longer necessary. 1250metersdeep (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Why is it no longer necessary? Please expand your rationale. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page no longer attracts vandalism as the subject is no longer contentious. The person is no longer active in politics and the page view is low compared to previous data. The page is only protected due to one vandalism attempt by an IP address which had not edited wikipedia since. I see no reason why there could be persistent vandalism once the protection is decreased. Therefore, I request that the page be no longer protected. CS012831 (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
The INES Level 7 classification for Bhopal is incorrect. The INES scale only applies to nuclear and radiological events. Official sources like the IAEA confirm this. Please correct the mistake. Itsrihan (talk) 08:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Done - The source used for this claim is explicitly titled "From Bhopal to Fukushima", and the quote provided did not include any sort of context as to whether it was referring to Bhopal or Fukushima; I find Fukushima to be far more likely. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC) |
16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
---|
Account creator[edit] |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. About to publish many geography stubs (manually written, differing in content, not violating MASSCREATE - see Ledenice and Zapeć for examples). Articles like Cirsium greimleri, First Vrbnik Breviary, Petər Klepəc and Veternica are more representative of my work, though. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I would like to start using AWB for carrying out tedious/minor edits, I've familiarized myself with the documentation and I meet the criteria for use. Thank you. Boredintheevening (talk) 00:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
I moved Troll (1986 film) to its current title. There is a film called Trolls (film) and Troll (2022 film). The original title Troll (film) would have to become a redirect to or a disambiguation itself. I don't wanna change all the links to Troll (film) manually. Sebbog13 (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]
I am requesting confirmed (autoconfirmed) rights for my account, SmartChimpanzee. I have already contributed two entries to the talk page for the article "2025 Potomac River mid-air collision" regarding a proposed update to the helicopter model information. However, since I do not yet have confirmed rights, I am unable to edit the main article directly. My contributions on the talk page have focused on adding information supported by reliable sources—specifically, evidence that the helicopter involved in the collision is a UH‑60M (the “gold top”) rather than the currently listed UH‑60L. Being able to edit the article directly would allow me to incorporate this important information and improve the overall accuracy of the entry. I have followed Wikipedia’s guidelines and have provided verifiable sources in my talk page entries. Granting confirmed rights would enable me to continue contributing effectively to the article and other related topics. Thank you for considering my request. SmartChimpanzee (talk) 22:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
i would like to redo some anatomical drawings for aesthetic and easy-to-read purposes, i have already created some, for example, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Otosakanum2 (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:
I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Hi. Currently the third most active pending changes reviewer on DreamRimmer's list, and I thought I'd try my hand at some larger-scale work of a similar fashion – rather than reviewing edits, reviewing articles. I'm good with newcomers and know how to work on articles. I'd also like to help reduce the frighteningly large backlog. Thanks for considering my request. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 12:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
My permissions expire at midnight UTC on February 8, so I am here to request a renewal of my new page reviewer permissions following its expiry. Reviewing new pages had been an educational experience in my Wikipedian career and I hope to do so to contribute after having my permissions renewed. MimirIsSmart (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
I was granted new page reviewer rights for 30 days until Feb 8th. I'd like to request that those rights be renewed. SunloungerFrog (talk) 23:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
One month ago I was given a trial run for NPR rights, which ended today. I enjoyed doing NPR and helping with the backlog, and I am requesting for a renewal of those rights for another month (or potentially longer) so I can keep helping with the backlog. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I would like to help clear the backlog and having done a couple of weeks and learned a bit I think I can make a useful contribution here. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 13:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Please renew my rights, thank you. Aqurs1 (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
I've been pretty active in the AFD process recently and been creating and improving articles as of late. I like going through the NPP and wish to become a reviewer to reduce the backlog and help out. I've already had a hand in improving some of the articles on there, by fixing up errors, adding categories, linking them in other pages etc. I hope to become a reviewer to help out, thanks! jolielover♥talk 17:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have authored a few articles, improved the quality of many articles including adding high quality references and improving encyclopedic quality. I have also limited experiences in deletion. I also have just been granted AFC reviewer options and starting to increase my participation in that. Welcome feedback if I can qualify. Thanks for the consideration Trex32 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Though I predominantly work with redirects, at least recently, I also engage with new pages and would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. I have made almost 46,000 edits and believe that I can help. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to be a new page reviewer, I continuously contribute to New Pages and having failed the previous request to be one, i would like to try once again having positively learned more and contributed to much more new pages. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
---|
Page mover[edit] |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
After starting with Recent Changes Patrolling I found myself in a very rewarding position, seeing that I can help other Wikipedians and the Wiki as a whole. But I also experienced the limitation of not having the Rollback right so I'd like to switch to AntiVandal or Huggle. Squawk7700 (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor[edit]
I come across bugs in template-protected templates from time to time, and I think I'm proficient enough to fix them without someone else checking it over. For instance, I recently submitted an edit request to fix {{Huggle/warn-unsor-2}}'s substitution behavior, and I found a similar issue in {{uw-editsummary2}}. I understand that edits to widely-used templates should be tested in a sandbox first, that they should reflect consensus, and that they can have nontrivial performance costs. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:51, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
|
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Barnstar_of_Diligence.png)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
![]() |
WP:AIV | WP:ANI | ![]() |
WP:NPP | ![]() |
WP:RPP | ![]() |
WP:RFR | ![]() |
WP:AFD | ![]() |
WP:XFD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
CAT:CSD | ![]() |
WP:CSD | ![]() |
WP:RM | ![]() |
WP:RAA | ![]() |
WP:DR | ![]() |
WP:TM | ![]() |
WP:TT | ||||||
![]() |
WP:RCU | ![]() |
WP:LOP | ![]() |
CAT:AB | ![]() |
WP:BS | ![]() |
WP:RD | ![]() |
WP:NFC | ![]() |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [7] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system