Talk:Bob Black
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bob Black redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deleted???
[edit]FFS, Wikipedia retains an article about Michael Hobbes and not Bob Black? Wikipedia:Recentism is truly alive and well, and the idea that Notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY is seemingly dead. Black was a huge (and divisive) figure in 80s-90s Anarchism and a huge influence on Post-left anarchy. Admitedly, less well-known as the 2000s went on. Meanwhile, it seems anybody around today with an effing podcast will get a writeup in Wikipedia. The Recentist bias is over the top here. Peter G Werner (talk) 18:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)