Jump to content

Talk:Catholic Church sexual abuse cases

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Roman Catholic sex abuse cases/Archive 3" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Roman Catholic sex abuse cases/Archive 3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Roman Catholic sex abuse cases/Archive 3 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Roman Catholic sex abuse cases/Archive 2" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Roman Catholic sex abuse cases/Archive 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Roman Catholic sex abuse cases/Archive 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Criticisms of the church" needs to be separated out from "Critique"

[edit]

There's a clear distinction between the two sections. "Criticism of the church" contains a variety of information that should be sorted out and placed in the main article, since it contains core stuff like the non-removal of the accused from the Church. "Critique" should probably then be renamed something else to make it clear that it's dealing with criticisms of what could be called the "catholic sexual abuse narrative" - e.g. that the Catholic Church was worse than other institutions in this regard. Eldomtom2 (talk) 23:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sinéad O'Connor

[edit]

"After decades of inaction, Sinéad O'Connor brought the scandal to a head when she tore up a photo of John Paul II on a 1992 episode of Saturday Night Live. The protest drew praise from critics of the church but also the ire of many Catholics, which greatly damaged her career. Her protest would see increased positive reappraisal as corruption and suppression efforts by the church related to abuse became more popularly known."

This is lacking any citations. It also reads awkwardly in the lead section (lack of encyclopedic tone?), and is not mentioned anywhere else in the article. RTredwell (talk) 18:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]